“This win represents a triumph over hate. Our first amendment rights were affirmed today as drag artists and makers of theatre,” plaintiffs Friends of George’s wrote in a statement.
Trans rights activists march past the state capitol during a news conference by the Human Rights Campaign drawing attention to anti-drag bills in the Tennessee legislature, on Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2023 in Nashville, Tenn.
John Amis/AP Images for Human Rights Campaign
A federal judge on Friday (June 2) ruled that Tennessee’s first-in-the-nation law restricting drag shows violates the First Amendment, blocking it from going into effect and sending the closely-watched legal battle to a federal appeals court.
Two months after U.S. District Judge Thomas Parker issued a temporary restraining order preventing the state from enforcing the new law, the same judge issued a permanent injunction that will keep the law — titled the Adult Entertainment Act (AEA) — on ice unless the ruling is overturned by a higher court.
The judge wrote that freedom of speech as designed in the First Amendment is “not just about speech,” but also about the right “to express one’s identity, and to realize self-fulfillment in a free society.” Tennessee’s law, he said, infringed upon those rights.
“The Court finds that — despite Tennessee’s compelling interest in protecting the psychological and physical wellbeing of children — the Adult Entertainment Act (“AEA”) is an unconstitutional restriction on the freedom of speech,” Judge Parker wrote.
In a statement released following the news, Friends of George’s — the Memphis-based LGBTQ+ theater company that sued the state of Tennessee — celebrated their victory, while also looking ahead at future battles to come.
“This win represents a triumph over hate. Our first amendment rights were affirmed today as drag artists and makers of theatre,” the organization said in a statement. “While today is a moment worth celebrating as we kick off Pride month, our work is not finished. As the onslaught of hatred against the LGBTQ+ community continues around the country through the passage of anti-trans, homophobic, and draconian laws that seek to silence expression and identity, we will remain vocal and vigilant.”
LGBTQ media advocacy organization GLAAD also celebrated the ruling. President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said, “This ruling is a turning point and we will not go back. Every anti-LGBTQ elected official is on notice that these baseless laws will not stand and that our constitutional freedom of speech and expression protects everyone and propels our culture forward.”
Signed in March by Gov. Bill Lee, the AEA makes it a felony to perform “adult cabaret entertainment” by “male or female impersonators” in a location that could be viewed by children. Critics say the law, one of many proposed in states across the country, is a thinly-veiled attack on the LGBTQ community.
In their lawsuit, Friends of George’s claimed the new law was designed to target drag shows with “the fear of felony charges and the uncertainty about what could give rise to those charges.”
“This law, which specifically targets drag performances, threatens to return the LGBTQIA community to the days when they had to hide their identity and their art behind blacked-out windows,” the group wrote in their complaint, which named Lee and Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy as defendants.
On March 31, Judge Parker largely agreed with those arguments. He issued a temporary restraining order preventing the law from going into effect, saying the new law seemed to not only impose improper restrictions on free speech, but also was so vague that it would have a broader “chilling effect” beyond the statute’s actual scope.
In Friday’s ruling, the judge wrote that the AEA was “both unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad,” citing the law’s attempt to ban drag performances “anywhere” a minor could be present, not just on public property. The judge added that, “as a matter of text alone, the AEA is a content-, and viewpoint-based restriction on speech … passed for the impermissible purpose of chilling constitutionally-protected speech.”
The ruling sets the stage for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, where Tennessee can seek to overturn Judge Parker’s decision. However that court rules, either side could then take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Read the entire ruling here:
Daily newsletters straight to your inbox
More From Pro