Questions over ACCU review after allegations panel member urged ‘potential’ for investors
A member of the high-powered review of the integrity of Australian Carbon Credit Units is said to have raised their investment potential in comments that, if correct, raise concerns about the review process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bcc4/5bcc4d9b5bbd686a738e62898f0275dfa8591ee4" alt=""
There are questions over the government’s review of Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) after a member of the review panel discussed the “potential” for investment in ACCUs by an infrastructure fund she is linked to.
In July the government announced a review of ACCUs in the wake of a whistleblower, ANU professor Andrew Macintosh, revealing significant problems with credits generated by the Coalition’s Emissions Reduction Fund. Up to 80% of ACCUs generated by the scheme may be worthless in terms of actual additional emissions abated under the ERF — a claim rejected at the time by the Clean Energy Regulator that oversees the ERF.
The government will be relying on ACCUs and a new class of carbon credits created under its revamped safeguards mechanism as part of its emissions reduction plans.
Read more about ACCU concerns…
Already a subscriber? Log in to keep reading.
Or, register your email address for a FREE 21-day trial.
About the Author
Bernard Keane
Politics Editor @BernardKeane
Bernard Keane is Crikey’s political editor. Before that he was Crikey’s Canberra press gallery correspondent, covering politics, national security and economics.